Browse by
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet

University of Exeter > Business School > Department of Accounting > The determinants of the UK Big Firms Premium

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/23394
    Del.icio.us     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!

SFX Query

Title: The determinants of the UK Big Firms Premium
Authors: McMeeking, Kevin P.
Pope, Peter F.
Peasnell, Ken V.
Affiliation: University of Exeter; Lancaster University
Citation: Accounting and Business Research, 36, 3, 207-231
Publisher: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales
Journal : Accounting and Business Research
Issue date: Sep-2006
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/23394
Additional Links: http://www.abr-journal.co.uk/
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
Abstract: Our study attempts to determine whether, and if so why, the large auditing firms are able to earn a premium on their audit work in the UK. We start by confirming the apparent existence of a Big Firm premium during the period 1985-2002. We examine industry specialisation, non audit service fee and monopoly pricing explanations for the premium. The results of our tests of industry specialisation are mixed. There is little evidence that this premium is associated with industry specialisation when specialists are defined at the national level. Significant premium are observed if specialisation is defined at the city level, particularly if the auditor is the industry leader. However, when appropriate allowance is made for endogeneity, by modelling both audit and non-audit fees in a simultaneous equations framework, the Big Firm premium disappears. We find evidence to suggest that non audit fees earned by auditors from their audit clients are positively related to the size of the audit size and vice versa. Finally, when the sample is stratified by the size of audit client, we find no systematic evidence of anti-competitive pricing.
Type: Article
Language: en
Keywords: auditing
non-audit fees
Big Firm premium
pricing
ISSN: 0001-4788
Appears in collections:Department of Accounting

Files in this item:
File Description SizeFormatView/Open
McMeeking1.pdf180KbAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

All items in ERIC are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

 

OR Logo Powered by Open Repository
Valid XHTML 1.0!